ARSNET applies peer review policy to uphold the quality of publication in the journal. The overall peer-review process consists of an initial review process by editor, followed by a double-blind peer review, before then the decision is taken by the editor. The article is reviewed by at least two reviewers.

Your submitted manuscript is initially screened by the editorial team. Assessment will be performed to see whether or not the submitted project has met the scope of the journal and has been appropriately written in academic language accepted in the journal. The manuscript will also undergone a similarity check procedure to determine whether it indicates any traces of plagiarism. Manuscript that is not suitable for the journal's scope and are found with high similarity percentage (above 15%) will be rejected immediately.

Once considered suitable in the initial review phase, your manuscript will be reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers. The process is conducted as a double-blind peer review, where both authors and reviewers are anonymised throughout the review. The reviewers will provide evaluation regarding the quality of the manuscript and provide recommendation for its potential of publication. ARSNET journal avoids any possible conflicts of interest in assigning the reviewers, selecting its reviewers based on the field of expertise as well as academic experience.

After the review process is completed, the author(s) will be notified with the result, which may vary from Accepted, Accepted with minor revisions; Accepted with major revisions; or Rejected. The acceptability of the manuscript was made by the editor based on the informed recommendation of the journal's reviewers.