Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ARSNET

Editorial

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023)

Architecture and the subconscious

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v3i1.76
Published
2023-04-30
Article downloads
217

Abstract

The subconscious thinking governs the way the built environment is experienced and organised by its inhabitants. The collection of articles in this issue of ARSNET explores how our subconscious thinking provides alternative spatial narrative and design methods. The explorations in this issue highlight the different conditions and realms of the subconscious, as well as the various ways of learning and making driven by subjective subconsciousness. These inquiries offer deep thought on how the focus on subconscious thinking reveals hidden experiences and knowledge of architecture, as well as celebrating speculations and open-ended qualities that allow architecture to evolve.

References

  1. Anadol, R. (2020). Synaesthetic architecture: A building dreams. Architectural Design, 90(3), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2572

  2. Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2022). Interiority from the body, mind, and culture. Interiority, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i1.209

  3. Bollas, C. (2000). Architecture and the unconscious. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 9(1–2), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/080370600300055850

  4. Branco, R. M., Quental, J., & Ribeiro, Ó. (2015). Getting closer, empathising and understanding: Setting the stage for a co-design project with people with dementia. Interaction Design & Architecture(s), 26, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-026-007

  5. Flood, H., & Gensler, A. (2023). Extra-disciplinary dreams journeys into the foothills. Architectural Design, 93(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2916

  6. Hatherley, O. (2015). Silo dreams: Metamorphoses of the grain elevator. The Journal of Architecture, 20(3), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2015.1045011

  7. Highmore, B. (2002). Everyday life and cultural theory: An introduction. Routledge.

  8. Howard, L. (2002). The order of dreams. Places Journal, 14(3), 32–35.

  9. Jamieson, C. (2015). ‘WAKE/UP/AND/DREAM/FOR/THE/EIGHTIES’: Nigel Coates 1975–82. The Journal of Architecture, 20(1), 122–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2015.1011194

  10. Lüdtke, I. (2014). Architecture should be self-evident and comprehensible: An interview with Volkwin Marg. In E. Feddersen & I. Lüdtke (Eds.), Lost in space: Architecture and dementia (pp. 24–27). Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

  11. Martinelli, P. M. (2020). Fragments and visions of a spatial discourse: Re-viewing Georges Perec’s species of spaces. Architecture and Culture, 8(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1714323

  12. McLaughlin, N. (2020). Losing myself: Designing for people with dementia. Architectural Design, 90(6), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2631

  13. Pallasmaa, J. (2015). Body, mind, and imagination: The mental essence of architecture. In S. Robinson & J. Pallasmaa (Eds.), Mind in architecture: Neuroscience, embodiment, and the future of design (pp. 51–74). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10318.003.0005

  14. Sejrup, J. (2018). Japanese dreams: Kurokawa Kishō’s annex to the Van Gogh Museum and its later re-appropriation. Museum History Journal, 11(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19369816.2018.1427344

  15. van Gaal, S., de Lange, F. P., & Cohen, M. (2012). The role of consciousness in cognitive control and decision making. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00121

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.