Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ARSNET

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023)

Digital preservation of Rumah Tukang Kahar for cultural heritage tourism

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v3i2.71
Published
2023-10-31
Article downloads
89
Submitted
2023-03-16
Accepted
2023-10-21

Abstract

The paper focuses on exploring the virtual collaboration process in the digital preservation project of Rumah Tukang Kahar, a traditional Malay house in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, as a form of cultural heritage tourism. The purpose of the project is to develop an augmented reality interface through mobile app, website, and pamphlets with AR markers, to virtually and physically boost Malaysia heritage tourism economy. This paper describes a year-long virtual collaboration process between multidisciplinary and transnational researchers with various expertise between Malaysia and Indonesia under the Indonesia-Malaysia Research Consortium (I'MRC) initiatives. The paper reflects on the design and product development process and challenges within the virtual collaboration between two universities. The researchers’ involvement in the virtual collaboration process suggests that effective asynchronous and synchronous communication using online textual and visual communication tools and platforms leads to more effective, productive, and meaningful outcomes in research, collaboration, and product development.

References

  1. Adie, B. A., & Hall, C. M. (2017). Who visits World Heritage? A comparative analysis of three cultural sites. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2016.1151429

  2. Aka, K. A. (2019). Integration Borg & Gall (1983) and Lee & Owen (2004) models as an alternative model of design-based research of interactive multimedia in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318, Article 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012022 

  3. Alfonso, I., & Michela, C. (2016). Handbook of research on emerging technologies for digital preservation and information modeling. IGI Global.

  4. Ariffin, S. I. (2001). Order in traditional Malay house order form. Oxford Brookes University.

  5. Barfield, A. (2016). Collaboration. ELT Journal, 70(2), 222–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv074

  6. Basiya, R., & Rozak, H. A. (2012). Kualitas dayatarik wisata, kepuasan dan niat kunjungan kembali wisatawan mancanegara di Jawa Tengah. Dinamika Kepariwisataan, 11(2).

  7. Bennett, T. (2004). Pasts beyond memory: Evolution, museums, colonialism. Psychology Press.

  8. Bentkowska-Kafel, A., & MacDonald, L. W. (Eds.). (2017). Digital techniques for documenting and preserving cultural heritage. ARC Humanities Press.

  9. Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Siwar, C., & Ismail, S. M. (2013). Tourism development in Malaysia from the perspective of development plans. Asian Social Science, 9(9), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n9p11

  10. Bordeleau, A., & Bresler, L. (2010). Drawing the map: Siting architecture. FOOTPRINT, 4(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.4.2.725

  11. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). Logman.

  12. Brucks, M. S., & Levav, J. (2022). Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation. Nature, 605, Article 7908. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04643-y

  13. Burgess, H., Jongbloed, K., Vorobyova, A., Grieve, S., Lyndon, S., Wesseling, T., Salters, K., Hogg, R. S., Parashar, S., & Pearce, M. E. (2021). The “sticky notes” method: Adapting interpretive description methodology for team-based qualitative analysis in community-based participatory research. Qualitative Health Research, 31(7), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211002489

  14. Byrne, D. (2008). A critique of unfeeling heritage. In L. Smith & N. Akagowa (Eds), Intangible heritage (pp. 243–266). Routledge.

  15. Chapagain, N. K. (2013). Introduction: Contexts and concerns in Asian heritage management. In K. D. Silva & N. K. Chapagain (Eds.), Asian Heritage Management: Contexts, Concerns, and Prospects (pp. 1–29). Routledge. 

  16. Chen, J., & Lin, B. (2004). Virtual collaboration in the workplace. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/VIRTUAL-COLLABORATION-IN-THE-WORKPLACE-Chen-Lin/232e4386e8e7e7390a4c8fee908ae4f966056f3f

  17. Chen, J., & Neo, P. (2019). Texting the waters: An assessment of focus groups conducted via the WhatsApp smartphone messaging application. Methodological Innovations, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119884276

  18. Chen, Y.-R., Ariffin, S. I., & Wang, M.-H. (2008). The typological rule system of Malay houses in Peninsula Malaysia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 7(2), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.7.247

  19. Colin, W. (2003). Guidelines for the preservation of digital heritage. UNESCO National Library of Australia. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001300/130071e.pdf

  20. Crystal, D. (Ed.). (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (3rd ed.).Cambridge University Press.

  21. Datnow, A. (2011). Collaboration and contrived collegiality: Revisiting Hargreaves in the age of accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9154-1

  22. Design research: Conducting collaborative design research. (2017, May 11). MiroBlog. https://miro.com/blog/collaboration-on-design-research/

  23. Garro-Abarca, V., Palos-Sanchez, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2021). Virtual teams in times of pandemic: Factors that influence performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624637

  24. Historic England. (2016). Making changes to heritage assets: Historic England advice note 2. https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/making-changes-heritage-assets-advice-note-2/

  25. Hosseini, E., Mursib, G., Nafida, R., & Shahedi, B. (2014). Malay vernacular architecture: Mirror of the past, lessons for the future. The proceedings of 8th SEATUC Symposium, 10–14.

  26. Iacono, V. L., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016). Beyond binarism: Exploring a model of living cultural heritage for dance. Dance Research, 34(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2016.0147

  27. International Council on Monuments and Sites. (2011, November 11). The norms of Quito—1967: Final report of the meeting on the preservation and utilization of monuments and sites of artistic and historical value held in Quito, Ecuador, from November 29 to December 2, 1967. https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/168-the-norms-of-quito

  28. International Council on Monuments and Sites. (2013). The Burra Charter (The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance). Australia ICOMOS. https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Burra-Charter-2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf 

  29. Jarrahi, M. H., & Sawyer, S. (2013). Social technologies, informal knowledge practices, and the enterprise. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 23(1–2), 110–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2013.748613

  30. Jensen, M. M., Thiel, S.-K., Hoggan, E., & Bødker, S. (2018). Physical versus digital sticky notes in collaborative ideation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 27(3), 609–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9325-1

  31. Jesenská, P. (2015). How electronic communication changes English language. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 3(2), 132–141.

  32. Karimah, A., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2021). Catalogue drawing: A framing device for design thinking. ARSNET, 1(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v1i1.6

  33. Khalid, A. (2022). Conservation challenges and emerging trends of digital preservation for UNESCO architectural heritage, Pakistan. Conservation, 2(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation2010003

  34. Kurin, R. (2004). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: A critical appraisal. Museum International, 56(1–2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00459.x

  35. Lah, N. A. A., Wahab, M. H. A., Koh, D., & Saruwono, M. (2015). Metaphysical approach for design functionality in Malay-Islamic architecture. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.231

  36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

  37. Lawrence, R. J. (2010). Deciphering interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary contributions. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 125–130.

  38. Lee, W. W., & Owens, D. L. (2004). Multimedia-based instructional design: Computer-based training, web-based training, distance broadcast training, performance-based solutions. John Wiley & Sons.

  39. Li, Y., Du, Y., Yang, M., Liang, J., Bai, H., Li, R., & Law, A. (2023). A review of the tools and techniques used in the digital preservation of architectural heritage within disaster cycles. Heritage Science, 11, Article 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01035-x

  40. Lim, J. Y. (1987). The Malay house: Rediscovering Malaysia’s indigenous shelter system. Institut Masyarakat Pulau Pinang.

  41. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. Human Behavior & Environment: Advances in Theory & Research, 12, 1–12.

  42. Maudlin, D. (2009). The legend of Brigadoon: Architecture, identity and choice in the Scottish Highlands. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 20(2), 45–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41758700

  43. Mcgregor, S. L. T. (2004). The nature of transdisciplinary research and practice. Kappa Omicron Nu Human Sciences Working Paper Series.

  44. McKercher, B. (2002). Towards a classification of cultural tourists. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(1), 29–38.

  45. Mohamad Rasdi, M. T., Mohd. Ali, K., Syed Ariffin, S. A. I., Mursib, G., & Mohamad, R. (2005). The architectural heritage of the Malay world: The traditional houses. Penerbit UTM.

  46. Mohd Rashid, A. (2018). Disassembly and assembly in the Malay building culture [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Sheffield]. White Rose eTheses Online. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/22827/

  47. Mohd Rashid, A., Mat Yasir, A., & A Rashid, A. H. (2020). Case study of Miro: Utilizing collaborative workspace in virtual environment as public design exhibition and sharing space in the design studio. In N. D. A. Halim, Z. Saari, N. A. Samsudin, & M. Ali (Eds.), New Academia Learning Innovation (NALI) 2020 SYMPOSIUM (pp. 261–277). UTM Academic Leadership (UTMLead).

  48. Mosbah, A., & Khuja, M. S. A. A. (2014). A review of tourism development in Malaysia. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 1–9. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/10907

  49. Mwale, K. P., Keitumetse, S. O., & Mwale, L. (2022). The evolution of museum culture in Botswana towards multi-layered architectural heritage conservation. ARSNET, 2(2), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v2i2.61

  50. Nguyen, T. H. H., & Cheung, C. (2014). The classification of heritage tourists: A case of Hue City, Vietnam. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 9(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2013.818677

  51. Park, H. Y. (2013). Heritage tourism. Routledge.

  52. Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernández, A. (2013). The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 967–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.020

  53. Psomadaki, O. I., Dimoulas, C. A., Kalliris, G. M., & Paschalidis, G. (2019). Digital storytelling and audience engagement in cultural heritage management: A collaborative model based on the Digital City of Thessaloniki. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 36, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.07.016

  54. Radzi, R. M., Nasir, M. Z. M., Kamisan, M. S., Hussein, N., & Othman, Z. (Eds.) (1994). Rumah Tukang kahar No. 21, Kampung Tengah, Tanjong Ipoh, Negeri Sembilan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

  55. Saginatari, D. P., & Perkasa, A. (2021). Paint and decay: A colloquial conversation on preserving the urban heritage. ARSNET, 1(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v1i1.4

  56. Shih, N.-J., Wang, H.-J., Lin, C.-Y., & Liau, C.-Y. (2007). 3D scan for the digital preservation of a historical temple in Taiwan. Advances in Engineering Software, 38(7), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.09.014

  57. Sidyawati, L., Priyatni, E., Nasih, A., Prasetyo, A., Purnomo, A., & Mohd Rashid, A. (2022). Nusantara heritage website development to promote Malang cultural tourism. KnE Social Sciences, 220–225. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i13.11664

  58. Sulaiman, M. S. (2017). Challenges in the conservation of the Negeri Sembilan Traditional Malay House (NSTMH) and establishment of a conservation principles framework (Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh). Edinburgh Research Archive. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/23552

  59. Tate, A., Hansberger, J. T., Potter, S., & Wickler, G. (2014). Virtual collaboration spaces: Bringing presence to distributed collaboration. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 7(2). https://jvwr-ojs-utexas.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/7090

  60. Thwaites, H., Santano, D., Esmaeili, H., & See, Z. S. (2019). A Malaysian cultural heritage digital compendium. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 15, Article e00116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2019.e00116

  61. de la Torre, M. (2013). Values and heritage conservation. Heritage & Society, 6(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000011

  62. Trisnawati, N., & Idaman, N. (2019). Motivasi pengunjung mengunjungi museum di Kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta. IKRAITH-EKONOMIKA, 2(1), 125–136.

  63. Tschannen‐Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005493

  64. Vellinga, M., Oliver, P., & Bridge, A. (2007). Atlas of vernacular architecture of the world. Routledge.

  65. Verma, S., Warrier, L., Bolia, B., & Mehta, S. (2022). Past, present, and future of virtual tourism-a literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), Article 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100085

  66. Wang, Y. (2023). Exploring multiple dimensions of attachment to historic urban places, a case study of Edinburgh, Scotland. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2193817

  67. Waterson, R. (2010). The living house: An anthropology of architecture in South-East Asia. Tuttle Publishing.

  68. World Tourism Organization. (1997). Tourism 2000—Building a sustainable future for Asia-Pacific (English version). UNWTO eLibrary. https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284402267

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.