Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ARSNET

Articles

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)

Adaptive and inclusive seating design for transit-oriented interior

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v5i2.166
Published
2025-10-31
Article downloads
0
Submitted
2025-08-31
Accepted
2025-10-15

Abstract

As transit-oriented interiors increasingly evolve into complex commercial and social micro-environments and serve diverse user groups, seating design must respond beyond basic functionality to address the need for adaptation and inclusivity. This study explores adaptive and inclusive design strategies through the development of seating design in such a context. This research follows Liedtka's human-centred, iterative design process comprising stages such as empathy, definition, ideation, and prototyping in developing seating design for a transit-oriented interior at Canabeans Coffee, located within KCIC Halim High-Speed Rail Station, Jakarta.

The design integrates ergonomic, aesthetic, and accessibility considerations while responding to contextual challenges of a high-density transit environment. The design study proposes a circular bench as a form of seating that promotes adaptation and inclusivity for such a context. The bench is conceived as a seating solution that gives a moment of pause for its users in navigating the interior. The circular arrangements are adaptable for various user needs, fostering social interaction. The proportion, details, and materials of the bench support various mobility needs and enhance their spatial experience. This study contributes to the discourse on adaptive and inclusive strategies in public furniture design, emphasising the importance of harmonising function, comfort, and social meaning in transit-oriented interiors.

References

  1. Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2022). Responsive interior: Tactics for adaptation and resilience. Interiority, 5(2), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i2.238

  2. Aulia, I. T., Primayudha, N., & Dewi, R. S. (2023). Tinjauan sejarah, pengaruh & transformasi: Penggunaan motif hias Temesir Bali sebagai elemen perancangan interior [Study of history, influence, and transformation: The utilisation of Temesir Bali decorative patterns as interior design elements]. Aksen: Journal of Design and Creative Industry, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.37715/aksen.v8i1.4085

  3. Clarkson, P. J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., & Lebbon, C. (2013). Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. Springer.

  4. Gómez-Carmona, O., Sádaba, J., & Casado-Mansilla, D. (2022). Enhancing street-level interactions in smart cities through interactive and modular furniture. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 13(11), 5419–5432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01577-8

  5. Grabiec, A. M., Łacka, A., & Wiza, W. (2022). Material, functional, and aesthetic solutions for urban furniture in public spaces. Sustainability, 14(23), Article 16211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316211

  6. Hu, H., Liu, Y., Lu, W. F., & Guo, X. (2022). A quantitative aesthetic measurement method for product appearance design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 53, Article 101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101644

  7. Hurdley, R. (2007). Focal points: Framing material culture and visual data. Qualitative Research, 7(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078516

  8. Juliá-Nehme, B., Yoon, S.-Y., Cumsille, P., & Rodríguez, E. (2023). Assessing spatial user experience for design guidelines: A comparative study of outpatient waiting rooms with conventional versus modern features. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16(3), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231163338

  9. Juliá Nehme, B., Rodríguez, E., & Yoon, S. (2020). Spatial user experience: A multidisciplinary approach to assessing physical settings. Journal of Interior Design, 45(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12177

  10. Liedtka, J. (2014). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163

  11. Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/09/why-design-thinking-works

  12. Lima, M. (2017). The book of circles: Visualizing spheres of knowledge. Chronicle Books.

  13. Luck, R. (2017). Inclusive design and making in practice: Bringing bodily experience into closer contact with making. Design Studies, 54, 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.11.003

  14. Moercahyono, F., & Pasaribu, Y. (2023). The influence of "Moge" motorcycles on the design trends of automatic scooters in Indonesia. Jurnal Desain Indonesia, 5(2), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.52265/jdi.v5i2.326

  15. Mumcu, S., & Yılmaz, S. (2016). Seating furniture in open spaces and their contribution to the social life. In R. Efe, İ. Cürebal, A. Gad, & B. Tóth (Eds.), Environmental sustainability and landscape management (pp. 169–187). St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.

  16. Pongratz, C. R. (2025). Health in public space, micro-environments. In J. A. Lara-Hernandez, A. Melis, P. Boarin, & P. Besen (Eds.), The dusk of design: Exploring multidisciplinary approaches and evolutionary biology in architecture (pp. 187–203). Springer.

  17. Postell, J. (2012). Furniture design. John Wiley & Sons.

  18. Pramantha, R. Q., Febritha, F., Suryani, B. D., & Agustina, A. (2022). Folding sebagai strategi desain adaptif untuk lingkungan bertinggal [Folding as a design adaptive strategy for domestic environment]. ARSNET, 2(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v2i2.57

  19. Rinaldi, A., Viviani, S., & Busciantella-Ricci, D. (2025). Urban furniture design strategies to build healthy and inclusive neighborhoods. Sustainability, 17(3), Article 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030859

  20. Ryerson, M. (2015). An American benchmaker in Paris: Vive la difference!https://ryersondesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Furn-Soc-Journal-article.pdf

  21. Saha, A. K., Jahin, M. A., Rafiquzzaman, M., & Mridha, M. F. (2024). Ergonomic design of computer laboratory furniture: Mismatch analysis utilizing anthropometric data of university students. Heliyon, 10(14), Article e34063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34063

  22. Şatir, S., & Korkmaz, E. (2005). Urban open spaces with examples & the classification of urban furniture. İTÜ AlZ Journal, 2(1/2), 130–141.

  23. Sawyer, A., & Bright, K. (Eds.). (2014). The access manual: Designing, auditing and managing inclusive built environments (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

  24. Sipahi, S., & Sipahi, M. (2024). Raw material stage assessment of seating elements as urban furniture and eco-model proposals. Sustainability, 16(10), Article 4163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104163

  25. Siu, K. W. M., & Wong, K. S. L. (2015). Flexible design principles: Street furniture design for transforming environments, diverse users, changing needs and dynamic interactions. Facilities, 33(9-10), 588–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2014-0021

  26. Sosa, M., Ahmad, L., & Musfy, K. (2022). Adaptive ephemeral interiority: Upcycling site specific interiors. Interiority, 5(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i2.186

  27. Stanco, F., & Tanasi, D. (2012). Virtual Acropolis. Digital recreation of a Sicilian Archaic sanctuary. Virtual Archaeology Review, 3(5), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2012.4541

  28. Sydor, M., & Hitka, M. (2023). Chair size design based on user height. Biomimetics, 8(1), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010057

  29. Tirachini, A., Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2013). Crowding in public transport systems: Effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 53, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.06.005

  30. Utomo, A. M. F., & Setiawan, S. (2022). Mainan edukasi untuk kegiatan edukasi hemat energi "Earth Hour Bandung" [Educational toys for energy saving educational activities "Earth Hour Bandung"]. Jurnal Desain Indonesia, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.52265/jdi.v4i1.152

  31. van Hagen, M., Galetzka, M., & Pruyn, A. (2014). Waiting experience in railway environments. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality Reversal Theory Studies, 2(2), 41–55. 

  32. Wang, J., Zhi, J., & Zhang, X. (2025). Seat dimensions for comfort: Correlations and design method. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 35(3), Article e70005. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.70005

  33. Wu, R. (2018). Passenger experience of China's High Speed Rail (HSR) service. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 06(03), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.63018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.