Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)

The digital preservation of the Padley Mill as both heritage and knowledge

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v4i2.116
Published
2024-10-31
Article downloads
46
Submitted
2024-09-24
Accepted
2024-10-22

Abstract

Architecture is a form of tacit knowledge in which ideas can be learnt from the past, and that body of tacit knowledge can be recorded in order to give relevant guidance to today's productions. This methodological paper presents a timely reflection that seeks to document the digitisation of Padley Mill in the Grindleford Village of the U.K., which was the key design output and built heritage of the late British academic and architect Peter Blundell Jones. The paper starts with a brief review on the current developments on digital reality capture methods in architectural heritage studies, followed by the Padley Mill digital preservation case study via its three work stages utilising LiDAR data and photogrammetry data. It closes with a humanities echo after the historian-designer on the layering and storytelling of the historic environment. The distinction of this paper is it combines and enhances the digital visualisation and storytelling of endangered architectural heritage through 3D LiDAR scanning and digital photogrammetry, promoting further methodological debates in the digital preservation of architectural heritage.

References

  1. Bertellini, B., Gottardi, C., & Vernier, P. (2019). 3D survey techniques for the conservation and the enhancement of a Venetian historical architecture. Applied Geomatics, 12(S1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-019-00267-6

  2. Blundell Jones, P. (1985). Leader: Organic response. The Architectural Review, Article 1060, 23–24.

  3. Blundell Jones, P. (2000). Architecture as mnemonic: The accumulation of memories around Morris's red house. Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 21(4), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905490008583491

  4. Blundell Jones, P. (2016). Padley Mill: A question of interpretation. Cuaderno De Notas, 17, 160–170. https://polired.upm.es/index.php/cuadernodenotas/article/view/3488

  5. Blundell Jones, P., & Ren, X. (2018). Padley Mill: A question of interpretation (with postscript). Heritage Architecture, 1(9), 71–82.

  6. Chatzistamatis, S., E.Tsekouras, G., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2023). The quality in 3D acquisition of cultural heritage assets: Challenges and risks. In M. Joannides & P. Patias (Eds.), 3D research challenges in cultural heritages III: Complexity and quality in digitisation (pp. 65–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35593-6_4

  7. Crisan, A., Pepe, M., Costantino, D., & Herban, S. (2024). From 3D point cloud to an intelligent model set for cultural heritage conservation. Heritage, 7(3), 1419–1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7030068

  8. Duffy, F., & Hutton, L. (1998). Architectural knowledge: The idea of a profession. Routledge. 

  9. Dye, A. (2014). Architects and research based knowledge: A literature review. Royal Institute of British Architects. 

  10. Doğan, H. A. (2019). Implementation of eye tracking technology on cultural heritage research and practice. Igra Ustvarjalnosti, 7, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.15292/iu-cg.2019.07.016-021

  11. Doğan, H. A. (2023). Reasons for deterioration of historical buildings and the significance of memory in the adaptive reuse process of architectural heritage: Case study of Saint Vincent de Paul School in Istanbul. Wiadomości Konserwatorskie–Journal of Heritage Conservation, 73, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.48234/WK73ISTANBUL

  12. Epic Games. (2024). Processing without limitations: Process lasers & images automatically. Reality Capture.

  13. Hadjri, K. (2006). Experimenting with 3D digitization of architectural physical models using laser scanning technology. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 4(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.4.2.67

  14. Historic England. (2018). 3D laser scanning for heritage: Advice and guidance on the use of laser scanning in archaeology and architecture.

  15. Kingsland, K. (2020). Comparative analysis of digital photogrammetry software for cultural heritage. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 18, Article e00157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00157

  16. Köse, S., & Us, H. (2023). Application of Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) technology for documentation of cultural heritage buildings and structures: A case study Sarı İsmail Sultan Tomb. Advanced LiDAR, 3(1), 35–40. https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/lidar/article/view/977

  17. Muñumer, E., & Lerma J. L. (2016). Fusion of 3D data from different image-based and range-based sources for efficient heritage recording. 2015 Digital Heritage, 1, 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7413840

  18. Peter Blundell Jones Archive. (2023). The Peter Blundell Jones archive. The University of Sheffield Special Collections and Archives. 

  19. Peter Blundell Jones Library. (2021). Peter Blundell Jones library. https://sites.google.com/sheffield.ac.uk/peterblundelljoneslibrary/

  20. Ren, X. (2020). Thin mask, thick mnemonic: The idea of the wall and genius loci in two contemporary buildings. Arq: Architecture Research Quarterly, 24(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135519000460

  21. Ren, X. (2024). The built heritage of Peter Blundell Jones: The architectural critic's own houses as built criticism. International Conference on Architecture as Built Criticism.

  22. Samuel, F. (2018). Why architects matter: Evidencing and communicating the value of architects. Routledge.

  23. The University of Sheffield. (2023). The University of Sheffield's policy for digital preservation for students and staff [Policy].

  24. Till, J. (2016, August 23). Obituary: Peter Blundell Jones (1949-2016). Architects' Journal. https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/obituary-peter-blundell-jones-1949-2016

  25. Tucci, G., Bonora, V., Fiorini, L., & Conti, A. (2016). The Florence Baptistery: 3-D survey as a knowledge tool for historical and structural investigations. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI-B5, 977–984. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b5-977-2016

  26. Vinci, G., Vanzani, F., Fontana, A., & Campana, S. (2024). LiDAR applications in archaeology: A systematic review. Archaeological Prospection. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1931

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.