Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ARSNET

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)

The Consortium of Celestials: Cosmic objects equitable interactions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v4i2.113
Published
2024-10-31
Article downloads
87
Submitted
2024-09-07
Accepted
2024-10-09

Abstract

This speculative design study presents a provocative inquiry into the idea of an equitable society, addressed through the exploration of cosmic scale and celestial object interactions. The issues of injustice occurring in current society are influenced by the lack of access to resources and opportunities, where architecture also plays a part. Using a post-humanist approach, the study speculates on the scale of society, broadening the context of civilisation to develop an equitable society. The study creates a science narrative of a cosmic-scale civilisation as the basis of the architectural scheme between celestial objects in cosmic space that interacts in an equitable way. The narratives inform systems of architectural interactions that are designed to support an equitable life system, including communication, extraction, processing, and distribution of spatial and environmental resources. Five particular scenarios are outlined to demonstrate these interactions, from scenarios of resource exchange, climate calibration, and anticipation of destruction. This study demonstrates an important discussion on how design of an equitable society can be informed by the interactions between cosmic objects, systems, and resources. In doing so, this study introduces new narrative of architecture as a form of extraterrestrial built environment, expanding the current understanding of context and its environmental limitations.

References

  1. Asal, E., Mason, S., Morley, S., O'Neill, A., & Will, G. (2022). Architect's role in creating equitable communities. The AmericanInstitute of Architects. 

  2. Badescu, V., & Cathcart, R. B. (2006). Use of class A and class C stellar engines to control sun movement in the galaxy. Acta Astronautica, 58(3), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.09.005

  3. Brophy, J. R., Friedman, L., & Culick, F. (2012). Asteroid retrieval feasibility. 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2012.6187031

  4. Busha, M. T., Adams, F. C., Wechsler, R. H., & Evrard, A. E. (2003). Future evolution of cosmic structure in an accelerating universe. The Astrophysical Journal, 596(2), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1086/378043

  5. Cornish, N. (1998). The Lagrange Points. WMAP Education and Outreach.

  6. Dickens, P. & Ormrod, J. S. (2007). Cosmic society: Towards a sociology of the universe. Routledge.

  7. Dyson, F. J. (1979). Time without end: Physics and biology in an open universe. Reviews of Modern Physics, 51(3), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.51.447

  8. Eternalised. (2022, January 10). The nightmare of total equality—A warning to the world. https://eternalisedofficial.com/2022/01/10/the-nightmare-of-total-equality/

  9. Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.

  10. Hawking, S. (1988). A brief history of time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. Bantam.

  11. Ishigami, J. (2010). Kenchiku-no-atarashii-ok̄isa [Another scale of architecture]. Seigensha.

  12. Kardashev, N. S. (1964). Transmission of information by extraterrestrial civilizations. Soviet Astronomy, 8(2), 217–221. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1964SvA.....8..217K

  13. Kassahun, T. P., & De Luigi, S. (2018). Architecture & human rights: A book on human, possible, poetic, poor-friendly, creative, joyful, realistic, fair, food secure, children-friendly, democratic, private, communal, functional, sustainable, citizen centered, just, inclusive, and human rights directed urban thinking (J. Kavanagh, Ed.). Niggli Verlag.

  14. Kivlinieks, J. (2022). The role of architecture in the physical and cultural segregation of Riga in second half of 19th century. TU Delft. https://repository.tudelft.nl/record/uuid:e27aad20-87d3-4265-ad4b-34ae97cbeaea

  15. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). Justice. Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/justice

  16. Marchant, J. (2020). The human cosmos: A secret history of the stars. Penguin Random House.

  17. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Cosmos. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved May 17, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cosmos

  18. Monsó, S. (2019). Humans are superior—By human standards. Animal Sentience, 23(17). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1389

  19. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.). Manufacturing Modular Artificial-Gravity Orbital Refinery Spacecraft (TOP2-299): Space mining and in-situ resource utilization [Fact sheet]. Nasa Technology Transfer Program. https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/TOP2-299

  20. Nietzsche, F. (1916). Thus spake Zarathustra. MacMillan.

  21. Smith, J. (2022). Review and viability of a Dyson Swarm as a form of Dyson Sphere. Physica Scripta, 97(12), Article 122001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac9e78

  22. Xiaoyun, W. (2015). Core socialist values—Keywords: Equality. ChinaRenmin University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.