Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024)

Rethinking modularity as contextual design thinking

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v4i1.105
Published
2024-04-30
Article downloads
254
Submitted
2024-04-06
Accepted
2024-04-26

Abstract

This study aims to reflect and expand the notion of modularity in architectural design methods. The discussion about modular architecture is certainly familiar across architectural discourse; where its universality has been repeatedly challenged by the post-modern movement. The study aims to unpack and rethink the method and significance of modularity, not only as a means of repetition but as a contextual design response. The study generate reflection towards two lodge architecture design projects. The architecture of lodge provides complexities with regard to various programmatic needs, temporal occupation, quick construction processes, and often deep connection to the surrounding environment. This study examines four reflective concepts which expand the idea and method of modularity in architecture. First, the roof modules in lodge architecture promotes efficient spatial programs. Secondly, the use of modularity allows parallel operation of the building and the construction process. Thirdly, modularity enables construction of architecture as parts constructing the whole, creating connection between spatial scales. Fourth, modularity constructs the inside and outside experience, providing  connection with environmental context. This study offers a new perspective on repositioning and expanding modularity, not only as a means of repetition but also as a form of contextual design thinking.

References

  1. Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.

  2. Arisya, K. F., & Suryantini, R. (2021). Modularity in design for disassembly (DfD): Exploring the strategy for a better sustainable architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 738(1), Article 12024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012024

  3. Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2019). Interiority: At the threshold. Interiority, 2(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.66

  4. Bayliss, S., & Bergin, R. (2020). The modular housing handbook. Routledge.

  5. Boettger, T. (2014). Threshold spaces: Transitions in architecture: Analysis and design tools. Birkhäuser.

  6. Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Penguin.

  7. Combes, L., & Bellomio, A. (1999). Creativity and modularity in architecture. AV0CAADSecond International Conference Proceedings. 160–171. https://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/5a48.content

  8. Corbusier, L. (1986). Towards a new architecture. Dover Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=7fSTvQIr7ngC

  9. Corcuff, M.-P. (2012). Modularity and proportions in architecture and their relevance to a generative approach to architectural design. Nexus Network Journal, 14, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-011-0097-x

  10. Dharmawan, C., & Alviano, M. (2019). Pre-fabricated material for modular house. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 662(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/4/042020

  11. Duffy, F. (1990). Measuring building performance. Facilities, 8(5), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002112

  12. Foster, H. (Ed.). (1996). The crux of minimalism. In The return of the real: The Avante-Garde at the end of the century (pp. 35–70). The MIT Press.

  13. Frampton, K. (2001). Studies in tectonic culture: The poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture (J. Cava, Ed.). The MIT Press.

  14. Frampton, K. (2013). Bötticher, Semper and the tectonic: Core form and art form. In A. Ballantyne (Ed.), What is architecture? (pp. 138–152). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315012933

  15. Graafland, A. (1996). Architectural bodies. 010 Publishers.

  16. Gropius, W. (1965). The new architecture and the Bauhaus (P. M. Shand, Trans.). The MIT Press.

  17. Gropius, W., & Wachsmann, K. (2021). The prefabrication of the dwelling. In G. Herbert (Ed.), The dream of the factory-made house (pp. 1–22). The MIT Press.

  18. Hogan-O'Neill, W. (2021). Prefabricated and modular architecture: Aligning design with manufacture and assembly. The Crowood Press.

  19. Jenks, C. (1999). Modern movements in architecture. Revista de Arquitectura, 1(1), 5–6. http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/RevArq/article/view/975/1032

  20. Krauss, R. E. (1986). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. The MIT Press.

  21. Kurokawa, K. (1977). Metabolism in architecture. Studio Vista London.

  22. Larson, M. S. (1993). Behind the postmodern facade: Architectural change in late twentieth-century America. University of California Press.

  23. Lee, J., Son, J., Jeong, W., & Yi, J.-S. (2015). An economic feasibility analysis on the movable modular lodging buildings. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 16(5), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.5.012

  24. Lehtonen, T. (2007). Designing modular product architecture in the new product development. [Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University of Technology]. Trepo. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tty-200810021062

  25. Musa, M. F., Yusof, M. R., Mohammad, M. F., & Samsudin, N. S. (2016). Towards the adoption of modular construction and prefabrication in the construction environment: A case study in Malaysia. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(13), 8122–8131. https://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2016/jeas_0716_4572.pdf

  26. Plowright, P. (2014). Revealing architectural design: Methods, frameworks and tools. Routledge.

  27. Pollio, V. (1914). Vitruvius: The ten books on architecture (M. H. Morgan, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

  28. Prayitno, B. (2018). Green modular concept of sustainable kampong cityblock in Indonesia. In W. L. Filho, J. Rogers, & U. Iyer-Raniga (Eds.), Sustainable development research in the Asia-Pacific region: Education, cities, infrastructure and buildings (pp. 509–523). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73293-0_30

  29. Redyantanu, B. P. (2021). Going minimal: An exploration of reduction as a design method. ARSNET, 1(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v1i2.15

  30. Rudofsky, B. (1987). Architecture without architects: A short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. UNM Press.

  31. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.

  32. Silva, M. F. (2020). Another way of living: The prefabrication and modularity toward circularity in the architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), Article 042048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042048

  33. Smith, R. E. (2011). Prefab architecture: A guide to modular design and construction. John Wiley & Sons.

  34. Sosa, M., Ahmad, L., & Musfy, K. (2022). Adaptive ephemeral interiority: Upcycling site specific interiors. Interiority, 5(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i2.186

  35. Tamari, T. (2014). Metabolism: Utopian urbanism and the Japanese modern architecture movement. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7–8), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414547777

  36. Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and disjunction. The MIT Press.

  37. van der Rohe, L. M., & Puente, M. (2008). Conversations with Mies van der Rohe. Princeton Architectural Press.

  38. Venturi, R., Stierli, M., & Brownlee, D. B. (1977). Complexity and contradiction in architecture. The Museum of Modern Art.

  39. Wallance, D. (2021). The future of modular architecture. Routledge.

  40. Whitfield, R. C., Lin, L.-C., Noordzy, G., & Chirumiko, L. T. (2022). Developing the meridian adventure dive resort: A modular construction case study. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 22(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2022.2049435

  41. Yatmo, Y. A., Atmodiwirjo, P., Saginatari, D. P., & Harahap, M. M. Y. (2021). Development of modular school design as a permanent solution for post-disaster reconstruction in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2019-0070

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.